<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Company Blog &#187; hosting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edendevelopment.co.uk/blogs/company/category/hosting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edendevelopment.co.uk/blogs/company</link>
	<description>Eden Development Company Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:22:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>EC2, load balancing and fault tolerance</title>
		<link>http://edendevelopment.co.uk/blogs/company/2008/12/03/ec2-load-balancing-and-fault-tolerance/</link>
		<comments>http://edendevelopment.co.uk/blogs/company/2008/12/03/ec2-load-balancing-and-fault-tolerance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ec2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edendevelopment.co.uk/blog/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So we&#8217;ve decided to switch to Amazon&#8217;s EC2 for our hosting. Not that we&#8217;re unhappy with the service that Bytemark have been providing for our cluster, but EC2 offers a degree of flexibility, and hardware fault tolerance that you just can&#8217;t get when you manage the underlying virtual instances yourself. We&#8217;ll be making the switch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we&#8217;ve decided to switch to <a href="http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/">Amazon&#8217;s EC2</a> for our hosting. Not that we&#8217;re unhappy with the service that <a href="http://www.bytemark.co.uk/">Bytemark</a> have been providing for our cluster, but EC2 offers a degree of flexibility, and hardware fault tolerance that you just can&#8217;t get when you manage the underlying virtual instances yourself. We&#8217;ll be making the switch for most of our hosted services just after Christmas.</p>
<p>The one thing that EC2 could do with is a fully fault-tolerant solution for clustered websites. We&#8217;re not able to truly factor out the single point of failure when load balancing. We&#8217;re getting round this by keeping another load balancer up and running as a spare, and automatically remapping the IP addresses should the first load balancer go down.</p>
<p>This will cause a maximum of a few minutes outage in the event of any server hardware failure, which is better than our existing setup, but it sure would be nice if EC2 handled this for you&#8230;</p>
<p>Having said that we&#8217;re pretty happy with the way EC2 works. I&#8217;m a full believer in the concept of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_computing">Utility Computing</a> &#8211; eventually computing power could well be provided in much the same way electricity is today&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://edendevelopment.co.uk/blogs/company/2008/12/03/ec2-load-balancing-and-fault-tolerance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
